Best Project Management Tools to Track Meeting Action Items (2026)

Why meeting action items need a project management tool

Every meeting produces some combination of decisions, follow-ups, and action items. The problem is that most of these items live in meeting notes, chat messages, or someone's memory. Research consistently shows that the majority of meeting action items are never completed, and the primary reason is not a lack of effort. It is a lack of systems.

The gap between meeting notes and task tracking is where work disappears. When action items stay in a Google Doc or a Slack thread, there is no owner, no deadline, and no visibility. Nobody gets a reminder. Nobody can see the status. When someone asks "did we do that thing from last Tuesday's meeting?" the answer is usually silence.

A project management tool solves this by giving each action item a clear owner, a due date, a status, and a place where anyone on the team can check progress. The best tools also support automation, so items can move through workflows without manual updates.

When choosing a project management tool for meeting follow-through, look for these capabilities: flexible task views (list, board, timeline), assignment with due dates, automation rules for status changes and notifications, integrations with your meeting and communication tools, and a low enough friction that your team will actually use it every day. The tool that works best is the one your team will adopt consistently, not the one with the longest feature list.

1. Linear: best for engineering and product teams

Linear has become the default project management tool for fast-moving engineering and product teams. Its speed is immediately noticeable. Every interaction feels instant, from creating issues to navigating between projects. The keyboard-first design means power users can manage their entire workflow without touching a mouse.

Linear organizes work into teams, projects, and cycles (sprints). Issues support priorities, labels, estimates, and sub-issues. The cycle planning view makes sprint planning straightforward, and the roadmap view gives product managers a clear picture of what is shipping and when. Triage mode helps teams process incoming requests and bug reports without cluttering active sprints.

Where Linear falls short is flexibility. It is opinionated about how teams should work, which is a strength for engineering teams but can feel rigid for marketing, operations, or other non-technical functions. Custom fields are limited compared to tools like Asana or ClickUp. Reporting is focused on engineering metrics (velocity, cycle time), so teams looking for resource management or portfolio-level views may find it insufficient. Pricing starts at $8/user/month for the Standard plan, with Plus at $14/user/month adding more advanced features like triage and SLAs.

After Menutes captures your standup decisions and action items, you can create Linear issues directly from the summary. This is especially valuable for engineering teams where standups and sprint planning meetings generate dozens of tasks, bugs, and follow-ups that need to enter the backlog with proper labels and priorities. Instead of someone manually copying action items into Linear after each meeting, Menutes bridges that gap automatically.

2. Asana: best for cross-functional team workflows

Asana is one of the most established project management platforms, and its strength lies in serving teams across every department. Whether you are in marketing, HR, operations, or product, Asana has templates, views, and workflows that fit your process. It scales from a small team tracking a handful of tasks to an enterprise coordinating hundreds of projects.

The task model in Asana is versatile. Tasks can live in multiple projects simultaneously, which is essential for cross-functional work where a single deliverable touches multiple teams. Views include list, board, timeline (Gantt), and calendar. Custom fields let you track anything from budget to priority to approval status. Rules-based automation handles repetitive work like moving tasks between sections, assigning follow-ups, and sending notifications when statuses change.

Asana's weakness is complexity. The flexibility that makes it powerful also makes it easy to over-engineer your setup. New users can feel overwhelmed by the number of options and views. Performance can slow down in large workspaces with thousands of tasks. The free tier is limited to 10 users with basic features. Paid plans start at $10.99/user/month (Starter), with Advanced at $24.99/user/month adding custom rules, approvals, and portfolio views.

For teams that run regular cross-functional meetings, Menutes pairs well with Asana. When a product review or planning meeting generates action items for engineering, design, and marketing, Menutes captures every decision and task assignment. Those items can then flow into Asana where they are tracked across the relevant projects, each with the right owner and deadline. This eliminates the common problem of meeting notes sitting unread in a shared doc while the actual work never gets started.

3. Jira: best for software development teams

Jira is the industry standard for software development project management. It has been around since 2002, and its deep feature set for agile workflows, bug tracking, and release management is unmatched. If your team runs Scrum or Kanban, Jira has first-class support for both methodologies, including sprint boards, backlogs, velocity charts, and burndown reports.

Jira's issue types (epics, stories, tasks, bugs, sub-tasks) give development teams the granularity they need to organize work at every level. The workflow engine lets you define custom statuses and transitions for each issue type, so your bug workflow can differ from your feature workflow. JQL (Jira Query Language) is powerful for creating custom filters and dashboards. The Atlassian ecosystem (Confluence, Bitbucket, Trello) provides tight integrations for documentation, code, and lightweight task management.

The downside is Jira's complexity and learning curve. Configuration requires an admin who understands the system, and poorly configured instances become slow and confusing. The interface has improved in recent years, but it still feels heavier than tools like Linear or Asana. For non-technical teams, Jira can be overkill. Pricing is competitive: the free plan supports up to 10 users, Standard is $7.53/user/month, and Premium is $13.53/user/month with advanced roadmaps and sandbox environments.

After Menutes captures decisions and action items from your sprint planning, retrospective, or architecture review, those items can be turned into Jira issues with the appropriate issue type, priority, and sprint assignment. This is particularly useful for retrospectives, where improvement actions often get discussed but rarely make it into the backlog. With Menutes documenting every commitment, teams can hold themselves accountable by tracking retro items alongside feature work.

4. Monday.com: best for visual project tracking

Monday.com stands out for its visual approach to project management. The platform is built around customizable boards that use colors, status indicators, and visual layouts to make project status immediately obvious. For teams that think visually and want at-a-glance clarity, Monday.com is one of the most approachable options on the market.

The board structure is flexible. You can add columns for status, person, date, timeline, numbers, formulas, and dozens of other types. Views include table, Kanban, Gantt, calendar, chart, and workload. Dashboards aggregate data from multiple boards into executive-level summaries. Automation recipes let you set up triggers and actions without code, covering common patterns like "when status changes to Done, notify the project owner" or "when a date arrives, move item to the Overdue group."

Monday.com's weakness is pricing. There is no free plan for teams larger than two people. The Basic plan ($9/seat/month) lacks automations and integrations, which means most teams need the Standard plan ($12/seat/month) or Pro ($19/seat/month). Costs add up quickly for larger organizations. The platform can also feel feature-heavy for teams with simple needs, and the automation builder, while powerful, has a learning curve.

For meeting-driven project teams, Menutes captures every decision and assigned task from your weekly project syncs. Those items can then be added to your Monday.com boards with the right status, owner, and timeline. This is especially helpful for project managers who run multiple concurrent projects and need meeting outcomes to feed directly into their tracking system without manual re-entry.

5. Trello: best for simple kanban workflows

Trello is the simplest tool on this list, and that is its greatest strength. The card-and-board metaphor is instantly understandable. Drag a card from "To Do" to "In Progress" to "Done." No training required. For small teams or straightforward workflows, Trello removes all friction from task management.

Trello cards support checklists, due dates, attachments, labels, and member assignments. Power-Ups extend functionality with calendar views, voting, custom fields, and integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, and GitHub. Butler, Trello's built-in automation engine, lets you create rules, buttons, and scheduled commands to automate repetitive board actions.

The limitation is scale. Trello works well for one team managing one project, but it becomes unwieldy when you need to coordinate across multiple boards, track dependencies, or generate reports. There are no native timeline or Gantt views. Reporting is minimal. For organizations managing complex, multi-team initiatives, Trello will feel underpowered. The free plan is generous (unlimited cards, up to 10 boards per workspace), Standard is $5/user/month, and Premium is $10/user/month with dashboard views and more Power-Ups.

Trello pairs naturally with Menutes for teams that want a lightweight follow-up system. After Menutes captures action items from a team meeting, each item can become a Trello card on the appropriate board. This workflow is ideal for teams that hold weekly check-ins and need a simple, visual way to track who is doing what. The simplicity of both tools means there is virtually no overhead in maintaining the system.

6. ClickUp: best for all-in-one workspace

ClickUp positions itself as the everything app for work, combining task management, documents, whiteboards, goals, time tracking, and chat into a single platform. If your team wants to consolidate multiple tools into one, ClickUp has the broadest feature set on this list.

The task management core is strong. ClickUp supports multiple task views (list, board, Gantt, calendar, table, mind map, activity), custom fields, relationships between tasks, and time estimates. The hierarchy (workspaces, spaces, folders, lists, tasks, subtasks) gives you fine-grained organization. ClickUp Docs lives alongside your tasks, so meeting notes, specs, and project briefs are connected to the work they reference. Automations cover a wide range of triggers and actions, and the template library includes setups for nearly every use case.

The trade-off is complexity and performance. ClickUp tries to do everything, and the result is an interface that can feel overwhelming, especially for new users. Navigation between different features requires learning the hierarchy and view system. Performance has been a recurring complaint, though it has improved significantly in recent updates. The free plan is functional but limited. Paid plans start at $7/user/month (Unlimited), with Business at $12/user/month adding advanced automations, timelines, and workload views.

For teams that want their meeting action items, documentation, and project tracking in one place, Menutes and ClickUp complement each other well. Menutes handles the meeting capture, producing clean summaries with decisions and action items. Those items flow into ClickUp where they join the broader project context, connected to docs, goals, and timelines. This is particularly useful for teams running all-hands meetings or quarterly planning sessions where action items span multiple departments and projects.

7. Basecamp: best for simplified project communication

Basecamp takes a deliberately different approach to project management. Instead of competing on features, it strips the experience down to six core tools per project: message board, to-dos, schedule, docs and files, campfire (group chat), and automatic check-ins. The philosophy is that most teams are over-tooled, and simplicity leads to better execution.

The to-do system is intentionally basic: lists with items, assignees, and due dates. No custom fields, no Gantt charts, no automation rules. What Basecamp does well is communication. The message board replaces long email threads with organized, searchable discussions. Automatic check-ins ask team members recurring questions (like "What did you work on today?") and collect responses in one place. Hill Charts provide a unique visual way to track progress on to-do lists without percentage-based estimates.

Basecamp's limitation is that it lacks the depth for complex project management. There are no task dependencies, no resource management, no advanced reporting, and no automation. Teams that need to track granular workflows, manage large backlogs, or coordinate dependencies across projects will outgrow Basecamp quickly. Pricing is flat-rate: $15/user/month, or $299/month flat for unlimited users on the Pro Unlimited plan.

For teams that value simplicity and clear communication, Menutes and Basecamp share a similar philosophy. After Menutes captures meeting decisions and action items, those items translate directly into Basecamp to-dos on the relevant project. The message board is a natural place to share Menutes meeting summaries so that everyone, including those who missed the meeting, can see what was decided and what needs to happen next. This combination keeps things simple while ensuring nothing falls through the cracks.

Feature comparison table

Here is a side-by-side comparison of all seven project management tools across the criteria that matter most for tracking meeting action items.

How to choose the right project management tool for meeting action items

The right tool depends on your team's size, technical depth, and how much structure you need around your workflows.

For engineering and product teams that run standups, sprint planning, and retros, Linear or Jira are the best fits. Linear is faster and more opinionated. Jira is more configurable and has a deeper feature set for complex development workflows.

For cross-functional teams where marketing, sales, product, and operations all need visibility into shared work, Asana or Monday.com are the strongest choices. Asana offers more depth in automation and portfolio management. Monday.com is more visual and approachable for non-technical users.

For small teams or teams with simple workflows, Trello or Basecamp will get you moving faster with less overhead. Trello is better for visual thinkers who like the kanban approach. Basecamp is better for teams that prioritize communication alongside task tracking.

For teams that want one platform to consolidate tasks, docs, goals, and chat, ClickUp offers the broadest feature coverage, though it comes with a steeper learning curve.

Regardless of which tool you choose, the critical link is getting meeting outcomes into the system consistently. This is where Menutes fits into the workflow. Menutes captures meeting decisions and action items automatically, so your team can focus on the discussion during the meeting and handle task creation afterward. Instead of relying on someone to take notes and manually create tasks, Menutes produces a structured summary with clear action items, owners, and context. Your project management tool of choice then becomes the execution layer where those items are tracked to completion.

The combination of automated meeting capture and a dedicated project management tool closes the loop between discussion and execution. Meetings become productive inputs to your workflow instead of time sinks with forgotten follow-ups.

Explore more from Menutes

Compare alternatives

Explore use cases